USPTO serial 79032493
PORTIA SUMMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3876325Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 2010
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PORTIA SUMMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
LAUREL V. DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED160 NORTH WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, wines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |