USPTO serial 79032498
GOLD VISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3845326Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2010
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLD VISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-6304 Zug, CH
CH-6304 Zug, CH
CH-6304 Zug, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telephones, telephones made of precious metal and precious stones, cordless, wireless and satellite telephones; mobile communicators, namely, mobile phones; smart phones, antennas for telephones, microphones for telephones, audio speakers for telephones, headsets for telephones, headphones, earphones, carrying cases for mobile telephones; digital cameras, video cameras; personal and car navigation devices and equipment, namely, computers; GPS receivers; memory cards and electronic circuit cards for mobile telephones; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, batteries, battery chargers, power supplies, electrical wires and cables for mobile telephones; personal digital assistants; blank magnetic data carriers, calculating machines, data processing and computer equipment, namely, personal digital assistants; all aforementioned goods not for use with currency and credit operated slot machines and gaming devices, namely, gaming machines for us in gaming establishments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | precious metals and their alloys; goods made of precious metal and their alloys, namely, jewelry chains, pendants, charms; jewelry, precious stones | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | paper, cardboard, posters; postcards; printed matter, namely, brochures, booklets, instructional and teaching materials featuring instructions on how to use telephones, cordless, wireless or satellite telephones and facsimiles machines; photographs; stationery; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; printers' type; printing blocks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TLCG IP GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by TLCG IP GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by TLCG IP GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named GOLD VISH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 7, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |