Drawing for IMPROVED READING

USPTO serial 79032514

IMPROVED READING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3445391Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 10, 2008
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPROVED READING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lara A. Holzman, Esq.

Lara A. Holzman Alston & Bird LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing educational services, namely providing seminars, workshops and web-based training in the field of advanced reading skills; arrangement of training courses in teaching institutes; arranging of educational exhibitions, seminars and conferences; education in the field of advanced reading skills rendered through correspondence courses; information on education; lending libraries; publication of books and texts; providing on-line publications in the nature of newsletters in the field of advanced reading skills; on-line publication of electronic books and journals; teaching in the field of advanced reading skills; vocational guidanceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 16, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 25, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 16, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 16, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 10, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 29, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 10, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 10, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 24, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance