Drawing for CATEGORIZATION CONSUMER OLFACTIVE CLASSIFICATION

USPTO serial 79032537

CATEGORIZATION CONSUMER OLFACTIVE CLASSIFICATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3550329Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 23, 2008
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CATEGORIZATION CONSUMER OLFACTIVE CLASSIFICATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith R. Obert,

Keith R. Obert, WARE FRESSOLA , MAGUIRE & BARBER LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5MONROE, CT 06468United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Marketing advice on the design, development and promotion of perfumes and flavours; promotion of perfumes and flavours; business research and market research studies; information services in the field of marketing perfumes and flavours, consulting services in the field of marketing perfumes and flavours, and commercial research servicesACTIVE—
042Research and development of new products, such as perfumes and flavoursACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2023ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Dec 13, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 5, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 2, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 10, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 10, 2015EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2014PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
Oct 8, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 23, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 7, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 17, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 24, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance