USPTO serial 79032546
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alex R Sluzas
Alex R Sluzas Paul and Paul1717 Arch StreetSuite 3740Philadelphia, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Gates made of metal and manually operated valves made of metal, not being machine parts | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | PNEUMATIC PINCH VALVES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES, NAMELY, FLANGE PINCH VALVES, SOCKET PINCH VALVES, AND VMP COMPACT PINCH VALVES, FOR PNEUMATIC CONVEYING SYSTEMS, CEMENT PIPING SYSTEMS, PIPING SYSTEMS FOR PIGMENTS AND GRANULATES, CERAMICS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, GLASS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, PLASTICS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, SEWAGE PIPING SYSTEMS, PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, FOOD INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, AND WINE INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS; MECHANICAL PINCH VALVES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES FOR PIPING SYSTEMS FOR ABRASIVE PRODUCTS, CORROSIVE PRODUCTS, AND FIBROUS PRODUCTS, AND FOR USE IN PNEUMATIC CONVEYING SYSTEMS, CEMENT PIPING SYSTEMS, PIPING SYSTEMS FOR PIGMENTS AND GRANULATES, CERAMICS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, GLASS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, PLASTICS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, SEWAGE PIPING APPLICATIONS, PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, FOOD INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, AND WINE INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS; PINCH VALUES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES USED AS OUTLET VALVES ON PNEUMATIC ROAD TANKERS, PNEUMATIC SEMI-TRAILERS, AND PRESSURE VESSELS; PINCH VALVES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES USED AS DISCHARGE VALVES ON PNEUMATIC ROAD TANKERS, PNEUMATIC SEMI-TRAILERS AND PRESSURE VESSELS; KNIFE GATE VALVES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES FOR USE IN SEWAGE PIPING SYSTEMS, POWER PLANT PIPING SYSTEMS, PAPER INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, FOOD INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, BEVERAGE INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, POWDER INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | VALVES, NAMELY, VALVES OF PLASTIC BEING OTHER THAN MACHINE PARTS; VALVE GATES, NAMELY, VALVE GATES OF PLASTIC BEING OTHER THAN MACHINE PARTS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 25, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |