Drawing for AKO

USPTO serial 79032546

AKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3564776Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 20, 2009
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with AKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alex R Sluzas

Alex R Sluzas Paul and Paul1717 Arch StreetSuite 3740Philadelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Gates made of metal and manually operated valves made of metal, not being machine partsACTIVE
007PNEUMATIC PINCH VALVES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES, NAMELY, FLANGE PINCH VALVES, SOCKET PINCH VALVES, AND VMP COMPACT PINCH VALVES, FOR PNEUMATIC CONVEYING SYSTEMS, CEMENT PIPING SYSTEMS, PIPING SYSTEMS FOR PIGMENTS AND GRANULATES, CERAMICS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, GLASS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, PLASTICS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, SEWAGE PIPING SYSTEMS, PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, FOOD INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, AND WINE INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS; MECHANICAL PINCH VALVES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES FOR PIPING SYSTEMS FOR ABRASIVE PRODUCTS, CORROSIVE PRODUCTS, AND FIBROUS PRODUCTS, AND FOR USE IN PNEUMATIC CONVEYING SYSTEMS, CEMENT PIPING SYSTEMS, PIPING SYSTEMS FOR PIGMENTS AND GRANULATES, CERAMICS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, GLASS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, PLASTICS INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, SEWAGE PIPING APPLICATIONS, PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, FOOD INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, AND WINE INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS; PINCH VALUES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES USED AS OUTLET VALVES ON PNEUMATIC ROAD TANKERS, PNEUMATIC SEMI-TRAILERS, AND PRESSURE VESSELS; PINCH VALVES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES USED AS DISCHARGE VALVES ON PNEUMATIC ROAD TANKERS, PNEUMATIC SEMI-TRAILERS AND PRESSURE VESSELS; KNIFE GATE VALVES BEING PARTS OF MACHINES FOR USE IN SEWAGE PIPING SYSTEMS, POWER PLANT PIPING SYSTEMS, PAPER INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, FOOD INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, BEVERAGE INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMS, POWDER INDUSTRY PIPING SYSTEMSACTIVE
020VALVES, NAMELY, VALVES OF PLASTIC BEING OTHER THAN MACHINE PARTS; VALVE GATES, NAMELY, VALVE GATES OF PLASTIC BEING OTHER THAN MACHINE PARTSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 2, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 24, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jan 20, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jan 26, 2017RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 27, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jan 17, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jan 17, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jan 17, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 18, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Aug 3, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 24, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
May 17, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 15, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
May 25, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
May 1, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 20, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 20, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 30, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 30, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 13, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jun 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 29, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 29, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Oct 29, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 26, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 4, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 11, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance