USPTO serial 79032565
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Nikolai
Peter Nikolai DeWitt LLP901 Marquette Avenue2100 AT&T TowerMinneapolis, MN 55402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Plastic packaging material, namely, plastic bags for packaging, plastic bubble packs for wrapping or packaging; cardboard cartons for packaging; packaging material of paper, namely, packaging paper, paper bags for packaging; packaging film of plastic not for commercial or industrial purposes, used to wrap food for household use; stretch film of plastic for packaging not for commercial or industrial purposes, used to wrap food for household use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Airbags and air cushions not for medial applications for safeguarding of goods and wares | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | Belts, not made of metal, for clamping and handling loads; ropes; stretching belts, not made of metal, for handling loads; textile packaging material, namely, industrial packaging containers of textile; packaging bags of textile material; lashing materials, namely, belts, not made of metal, for clamping and straps for angular clamping of loads, goods and wares | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transport of goods, namely, container transport; packaging articles for transportation, namely, restraining of cargo during transportation; packaging articles for transportation, namely, restraining of wares and goods in connection with loading services during transportation; packaging of wares and goods, namely, fluids and solids not for medical applications; packaging of articles for transportation, namely, packaging, bags, barrels, casks, bins, boxes and cartons used for restraining of wares and goods during transportation not for medical applications, [ * all of the aforementioned services not in connection with the removal and storage of waste materials occurring particularly at the cleaning of buildings, equipment, machines and textiles, at the remediation of fire and water damage, at demolition work, plumbing work and repairs of buildings, at the dehumidification of buildings and remediation of damage caused by fire, smoke, water for firefighting, tap water and flooding * ] * all the aforesaid services not in connection with the transport and storage especially of used materials accumulated from the cleaning of buildings, installations, machines and textiles, as well as from the sanitation of water and fire damages, from demolition works, plumbing and repair of buildings, from the dehumidification of buildings and also from measures of sanitation for damages through fire, smoke, water for fire-fighting, tap water and floods * | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 12, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 12, 2016 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 9, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |