Drawing for KUHNITECH

USPTO serial 79032567

KUHNITECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3524305Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 28, 2008
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KUHNITECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN

Jeffrey H. Kaufman Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer programs and software for use in database managementSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
038Telecommunications, namely, transmission of voice, data, images, audio, video and information via telephone, television and global communication networks; communications by computer terminals; transmission of information held in data banks, especially texts, images and sounds; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network and providing access to telecommunications networks; transfer of information via computer, satellite and broadcast networks; providing access to databases via the internet; transmission of technical information on interactive multimedia networks; transmission of information over electronic mediaSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Providing of training, namely, training in the use and operation of agricultural machinerySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 22, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 4, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 4, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 29, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 29, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 2, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 17, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance