Drawing for MT1

USPTO serial 79032611

MT1

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488797Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
STEPHENS, SONYA B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MT1?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Ceramic particles for use as a grinding media in the industrial grinding industry, namely, ceramic alloy grain particles inserted into industrial grinders for the fine and superfine grinding of various materials, namely, minerals, pigments, paints, ceramics, agro-chemicals, pharmaceuticals and abrasivesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 8, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 20, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 1, 2016INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 20, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 20, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 28, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 11, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 28, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance