USPTO serial 79032655
ZESA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3472405Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2008
- Examiner
- BLANE, SUZANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZESA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, ORTHOPEDIC INSERTS FOR SHOES, ORTHOPEDIC INSOLES AND SHAPED SOLES IN THE FORM OF SOLID PLASTIC INSERTS WITH FOOTBEDS OR ANATOMICALLY SHAPED DEEP FOOTBEDS OF NATURAL CORK, THERMO-CORK, PLASTIC, LATEX OR FOAMED PLASTIC MATERIALS, NAMELY, ELASTIC COMPOUNDS OF CORK-LATEX OR PLASTIC-CORK MIXTURES; ORTHOPEDIC SHOES AND OTHER ORTHOPEDIC FOOTWEAR | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER BAGS, SUITCASES, WALLETS, BILLFOLDS, KEY CHAINS, CASES FOR KEYS, HANDBAGS, BRIEFCASES, PURSES; BAGS, NAMELY, ALL PURPOSE CARRYING BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, HANDBAGS, KEY BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, BEACH BAGS, WAIST BAGS, SADDLE BAGS; HIP SACKS; UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS; WALKING STICKS; SADDLERY, SADDLERY OF LEATHER | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, IN PARTICULAR SPORTS AND LEISURE WEAR, NAMELY, SHIRTS, TROUSERS, JACKETS, TIGHTS, T-SHIRTS, WAISTCOATS, UNDERWEAR, SOCKS, STOCKINGS; ACCESSORIES FOR CLOTHING, NAMELY, NECK AND SHOULDER WEAR IN THE FORM OF HEADSCARVES, SCARVES AND SHAWLS, TIES, BOW-TIES, HOODS, SWEATBANDS, MITTENS AND GLOVES; BELTS; OUTERCLOTHING, NAMELY, COATS, JACKETS, PARKAS, BLAZERS AND WIND RESISTANT JACKETS; FOOTWEAR AND PARTS THEREFOR INCLUDED IN THIS CLASS, NAMELY, FOOTWEAR, ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR, SHOES, SHOES WITH ANATOMICALLY SHAPED FOOTBEDS, WORK SHOES NOT FOR PROTECTION AGAINST FIRES, RADIATION AND ACCIDENTS; BOOTS, SANDALS, CHILDREN'S SANDALS, GYMNASTIC SANDALS, OPEN TOED-SANDALS, BACKLESS SLIPPERS, SLIPPERS, SANDALS WITH HEEL STRAPS, CLOGS; FOOT PADS AND SHOE INSERTS, INSERTS TO PROTECT THE PRESSURE-SENSITIVE POINTS OF THE FOOT, FOOT SUPPORTS, FITTED PARTS OF SHOES, HEEL CUPS, WEDGES, PADS, INSOLES, HEELS, SOLES, PARTS OF SHOE BOTTOMS, FOOTBEDS AND SHAPED SOLES AND PARTS THEREFOR; SHAPED SOLES AND FOOTBEDS FOR PRIMARILY NON-ORTHOPEDIC PURPOSES IN THE FORM OF SOLID PLASTIC INSERTS WITH FOOTBEDS OR ANATOMICALLY SHAPED DEEP FOOTBEDS, IN PARTICULAR OF NATURAL CORK, THERMO-CORK, PLASTIC, LATEX OR FOAMED PLASTIC MATERIALS, INCLUDING ALSO ELASTIC COMPOUNDS OF CORK-LATEX OR PLASTIC-CORK MIXTURES NOT FOR MEDICAL USE | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ockenfels GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by C.B. SHOES GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by C.B. SHOES GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by C.B. SHOES GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ZESA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |