USPTO serial 79032658
TSUGAMI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3360028Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2007
- Examiner
- SAPP, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with TSUGAMI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie S. Buntin
Stephanie S. Buntin HOWARD & HOWARD ATTORNEYS, PLLC450 WEST FOURTH STREETROYAL OAK, MI 48067-2557UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Metalworking machines and tools; [ boring machines for metalworking; drilling machines for metalworking; ] grinding machines for metalworking; [ lapping machines for metalworking; ] lathes for metalworking; metalworking machine tools; [ milling machines for metalworking; ] oil hydraulic presses for metalworking; [ rolling mills for metalworking; ] tool holders for metalworking machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 11, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 25, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 5, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |