USPTO serial 79032669
DENTYL PH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENTYL PH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical products for non-medical purposes, namely, chemical compositions for the testing and for the treatment of conditions associated with bad breath and halitosis; oral hygiene testing kits containing peptide substrates used in analyzing and detecting certain toxins associated with bad breath and halitosis for laboratory or research use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 003 | Dentifrices; oral hygiene products, namely, interdental cleaners; preparations for cleaning and for flavoring the mouth, breath, teeth and artificial dentures; non-medicated toilet preparations for the mouth, breath, teeth and artificial dentures; non-medicated mouth washes, mouth rinses and gargling preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and medicinal preparations and substances for mouth, breath, teeth and artificial dentures, and oral hygiene for the treatment of gum disease; disclosing tablets and liquids for the treatment of oral bacteria and plaque; Chemical products for medical purposes, namely,chemical compositions for the testing and for the treatment of conditions associated with bad breath; oral hygiene testing kits containing peptide substrates used in analyzing and detecting certain toxins associated with bad breath and halitosis for medical purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Oak Brook Brands Limited
- Other trademarks owned by FRESH BREATH LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by D.D.D. Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named DENTYL PH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |