USPTO serial 79032694
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Cremorne, VIC 3121, AU
Cremorne, VIC 3121, AU
Cremorne, VIC 3121, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle D. Kahn
Michelle D. Kahn Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP4 Embarcadero Center, 17th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation of leather, and goods made of these materials not included in other classes, namely, handbags, key cases and purses, credit card cases, and key ring holders in the nature of leather key cases; trunks and traveling bags, overnight bags, briefcases, beach bags, backpacks, school bags, handbags, wallets and purses; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, bathing suits, belts, coats, gloves, jackets, jerseys, overcoats, pants, parkas, pullovers, scarves, shawls, shirts, socks, stockings, suits, sweaters, tee shirts, tights, trousers, underclothing and vests; footwear and headgear, namely, caps and hats | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring clothing, footwear, headgear; goods made of leather and imitation leather, trunks, traveling bags, overnight bags, briefcases, beach bags, backpacks, schoolbags, handbags, wallets, purses, credit card holders, cheque book holders, key ring holders; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; business intermediary services in the field of selling products and rendering services, namely, commercializing the aforementioned goods and retail store services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |