Drawing for ARCCESS

USPTO serial 79032702

ARCCESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318798Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARCCESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Gurfinkel

Daniel M. Gurfinkel Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC120 South LaSalle StreetSuite 1400CHICAGO, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for the metallurgical industry and machines for the steel-making industry, namely machines for charging and discharging furnaces, machines for tilting, rotating and displacing converters and ladles, casting machines; continuous casting machines, rolling machines for rolling metals,replacement and structural parts thereforSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Furnaces for metallurgical, steel-making, and continuous casting plants; cooling systems for machines for the metallurgical industry, for machines for the steel-making industry, and for continuous casting machines, namely cooling circuits consisting of cooling plates, cooling beams, injection nozzles for cooling medium, concentrating and cooling units for the cooling mediumSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 2, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 1, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 25, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 25, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 17, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 17, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 25, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 27, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 27, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance