USPTO serial 79032753
LAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Musical instruments especially electric guitars and basses or not; electronic musical instruments; music production stations; audio/video mixing consoles; amplified mixing desks; music synthesizers; sound effect cards; noise reducers; effects pedals; effects boxes; rhythm boxes; keyboards for musical instruments; master keyboards; plectrums; music strings; musical instrument stands, cases for musical instruments; covers for musical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 26, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |