Drawing for HANSEN

USPTO serial 79032774

HANSEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3480768Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 5, 2008
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HANSEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN ALUMIT

John Alumit ALUMIT IP135 South Jackson Street, Suite 200Glendale, CA 91205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motors, other than for land vehicles, namely, electric motors for machines; engines for machine operation; transmission couplings other than for land vehicles, namely, transmission couplings for machines; transmission belts other than for land vehicles, namely, power transmission belts for machines; aerodynamic wind turbines and structural parts therefor; planetary gear-motors; variable speed power transmissions; disk brakes for machines; drum brakes for machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 31, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 5, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 6, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 1, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 29, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 27, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 4, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance