Drawing for JENAQUA

USPTO serial 79032824

JENAQUA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JENAQUA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for industrial purposes, namely, chemical products for preventing and removing scale, surfactants, wetting agents, dispersing agents; chemicals for use in industry, namely, oil removing and fat removing agents for use in production processes; antifreeze; cooling agents, namely, coolants; glycol; acrylates for use as an adhesive; silicones, namely, silicone fluids, silicone resins, silicones for use in the manufacture of personal care and cosmetic compositions; adhesives for general industrial purposes; disincrustants for industrial use; chemicals for use in the manufacture of cleansers; chemical agents for water testing purposes, namely, pH-value stabilizing and buffering agents, water hardness stabilizing agentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
002Anti-corrosive preparations, namely, anti-corrosive paints and papers; preservatives against rust in the nature of a coatingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Cleaning agents, namely, all purpose cleaning preparations, alcohol and ammonia for cleaning purposes; rust removing preparations; all purpose cleaners for removing fatSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005BiocidesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Rinsing devices, namely, machines for cleaning surfaces using high pressure water, pressure washing machines; electrical injection pumps; electrical cleaning devices, namely, vacuum cleanersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
008Hand operated pumps, namely, manually operated injection pumpsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Water cleaning systems and devices, namely, systems primarily comprised of swimming pool water cleaning and filtering units, swimming pool water cleaning and filtering units; water filtration devices, namely, water filters, water filtering units for domestic, commercial and industrial useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Chemical analysis, namely, water analysis; chemical surveying and technical consultancy in the field of chemicalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 17, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 3, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 1, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 27, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 24, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 22, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 22, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 20, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 20, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 20, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 18, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 2, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 25, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 24, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Jan 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance