USPTO serial 79032859
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claudia W. Stangle
Claudia W. Stangle Leydig Voit & Mayer, Ltd.Two Prudential Plaza, 180 N. Stetson AveSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for domestic and commercial laundry care, namely, washing machines, washing machines for laundry, washing machines with disinfection treatment, washing machines with sterilization treatment, washer-extractors, ironing machines in the nature of rotary ironers and flatwork ironers, electric clothes presses, domestic and commercial dishwashers, vacuum cleaners and floor cleaning machines for cleaning in hotels, laboratories, hospitals, care centers and doctors' surgeries, cleaning machines for cleaning medical instruments and accessories, cleaning machines with thermal disinfection capability and sterilization treatment for cleaning healthcare and medical instruments and accessories, dishwashers with thermal disinfection capabilities, dental washers for the disinfection of dental instruments, laboratory glassware washers, and surgical instrument washers; machines and electromechanical appliances for the preparation of beverages, namely, electric food processing machines, electric mixers for household use, electric juice presses for domestic purposes, electric cleaning apparatus for the household, namely, vacuum cleaners, fan-driven brushes for vacuum cleaners, electric brushes for vacuum cleaners, vacuum cleaner floor attachments, tubes, hoses and filters, floor polishing machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus and instruments for heating, steaming, cooking, refrigerating, freezing, ventilating and water supply, namely, electric and gas ovens, cooking ranges, stoves, electric cookers, hobs, hot plates, heater plates, oven interiors and cookers for domestic and commercial applications, microwave ovens, electric and gas grills, fan-assisted electric cookers , electric fryers, griddles, fast cooking electric appliances, namely, electric pressure cookers, electric steam cookers, electric bain-maries, electric warming cabinets for food, cooker hoods, extractor ventilators for use in kitchens, refrigerators, refrigeration appliances and refrigeration units, namely, freezers, upright freezers, chest freezers, drink coolers, ice boxes, ice-making machines, electric coffee machines; machines for drying laundry, namely, electric tumble dryers, electric clothes drying cupboards and spin dryers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ Furniture made of metal, wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn or laminated materials and substitutes for all these materials or of synthetic materials, namely, kitchen furniture, cupboards, base units, wall units, dresser units, tall units, built-in units, housing units, worktops made of metal, wood, synthetic, ceramic or laminated materials for kitchen furniture, namely, base units, tall units, built in units, housing units, wall units, and dressers, doors for kitchen furniture, laminated panels for furniture, tables, stools, chairs ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Assembling, repair, maintenance and installation of goods for commercial and domestic use, namely, kitchen furniture, laundry machines, machines for cooking, cleaning, ventilation and refrigeration; laundry care, namely, washing, drying and ironing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 8, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 4, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |