Drawing for ASIABAR

USPTO serial 79032952

ASIABAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASIABAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Bronze; aluminium; cast steel; iron, unwrought or semi-wrought; white metal; anti-friction metal; brass, unwrought or semi-wrought; cast iron, unwrought or semi-wrought; hoop iron; alloys of common metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jun 30, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 14, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance