Drawing for BACHI

USPTO serial 79032980

BACHI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3395085Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 11, 2008
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BACHI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fish, not live; seaweed extracts for food; clams, not live; processed anchovies, anchovy paste; herrings, not live; tuna fish; broth; crabs, not live; caviar; sea cucumbers, not live; preserved fish; fish croquettes; fillets of fish; prawns, not live; fat-containing mixtures for bread slices; spiny lobsters, not live; shellfish, not live; mussels, not live; edible molluscs, not live; oysters, not live; salted fish; food prepared from fish, namely, frozen, prepared or packaged meals consisting primarily of fish; sardines; soupsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 9, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 4, 2016RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 4, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 14, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jun 17, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 17, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 24, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2010WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2010WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
May 15, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 9, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance