Drawing for WAR ROCK

USPTO serial 79032984

WAR ROCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508790Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WAR ROCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tawnya R. Wojciechowski

Tawnya R. Wojciechowski TRW Law Group19900 MacArthur Blvd.Suite 1150IRVINE, CA 92612-8433

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer games software; computer games program; computer games software downloadable from the Internet; computer games program downloadable from the InternetSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
041Providing online computer games via networks between communication networks and computers; providing recreation facilitiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 18, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 5, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jan 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 1, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 7, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 7, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 6, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 5, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 9, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED
May 5, 2008RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED
Apr 24, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Apr 18, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Jan 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance