Drawing for EST

USPTO serial 79033024

EST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508791Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura R. Wanek

LAURA R. WANEK GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD.300 S WACKER DR 25TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment for conducting friction and abrasion tests on lubricants and other materials, namely, detectors for performing friction and abrasion tests on lubricants, detectors for performing bench tests of motor components; analysis equipment, namely, analyzers for analyzing nanoscale wear by means of sensor technology and radio nuclide technology; profilometers; measuring equipment, namely, detectors for measuring friction and wear, analyzers for analyzing microscopic and macroscopic surface damages; detectors, namely, detectors for nano wear radionuclide technology, analyzers for analyzing microscopic and/or macroscopic surface defects; quality testing machines, namely, detectors for measuring friction and wear of lubricants and materials; metal detectors for industrial or military purposes; weighing equipment, namely, scales and balances; friction spectroscopes; integrated circuits; computer software for the compilation of data for use in material and lubricant testing apparatus; pressure gauges; friction gaugesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Materials and quality testing and evaluation, namely, testing regarding the quality of lubricants and materials; chemical analysis; engineering; research and development of new products for others; chemical research; technical research in the field of lubricants and materials; mechanical research; research in the field of physics; technical surveyingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 23, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 23, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 1, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 13, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 12, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance