USPTO serial 79033052
MARZIPLANNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3360034Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2007
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARZIPLANNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD's, videos, and DVD's featuring wedding and special event planning; computer software for use in event database management, event scheduling, reporting using spreadsheets and word processing, event budget management, event stationery creation, floor-plan creation and wedding and event planning advice; downloadable audio and video recordings featuring wedding and special event planning, bridal advice, wedding and event management promotional material; downloadable software for use in event database management, event scheduling, reporting using spreadsheets and word processing, event budget management, event stationery creation, floor-plan creation and wedding and event planning advice | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Publication of internet based electronic magazine; planning of entertainment services, namely, special event planning provided online; rental of entertainment equipment for wedding functions, dinners and receptions namely, rental of audio-visual equipment, cameras, portable stages and video screens and props; online production of radio and television programmes, all relating to wedding functions and special events; educational services, namely, courses, workshops and programmes in the field of wedding functions and special events | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ilka Newman
- Other trademarks owned by Ilka Newman
- Other trademarks owned by Ilka Newman
- Other trademarks owned by The Stratford Group
- Other trademarks owned by The Stratford Group
- Other trademarks owned by The Stratford Group
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MARZIPLANNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2018 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |