USPTO serial 79033071
KARTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3651207Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2009
- Examiner
- TENG, SIMON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KARTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL F. ROSS, P.C.
KARL F. ROSS, P.C. LUCAS & MERCANTI, LLP30 Broad Street21st FloorNew York, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | CONCRETE MIXERS THAT ARE ATTACHED TO TRUCKS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | FURNACES; INCINERATORS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | TRUCKS, NAMELY, LIGHT TRUCKS, TRUCKS FOR MINES; CONCRETE MIXING VEHICLES; TIPPING BODIES FOR TRUCKS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | non-metal fireproof building materials, namely, cladding for combustion chambers, smoke flues, pipes and pipe walls; refractory tiles in plate form, not of metal; chimney cowls, not of metal; chimneys not of metal; chimney pots, not of metal; chimney shafts, not of metal; chimney flues, not of metal; shores for chimneys, not of metal; support braces for chimneys, not of metal; cladding for chimneys, not of metal; flashing for chimneys, not of metal; building materials, non-metallic, namely, non metal window frames, non-metal ceiling panels, non-metal door panels, non-metal roofing panels, non-metal wall panels, non-metal window and door casings, semi-worked wood, plastic pipe supports; building stone | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND REPAIR OF FURNACES AND FURNACE COMBUSTION CHAMBERS, LINING AND COVERING OF COMBUSTION CHAMBERS; BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF REFRACTORY STRUCTURES AND SMOKE FLUES | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | SURVEYING; TECHNICAL CALCULATION, NAMELY, CALIBRATION; TECHNICAL PLANNING;, NAMELY, LAND USE PLANNING SERVICES; TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY RELATED TO SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF GEOLOGY, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, CHIMNEY CONSTRUCTION, CHIMNEY REPAIR | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KARRENA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by KARRENA GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by BEROA Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KARTEC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 19, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |