Drawing for WORLD PREMIUM RATES

USPTO serial 79033115

WORLD PREMIUM RATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLD PREMIUM RATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications services, telephone rental services, communications by telephone, mobile radiotelephony and communication by computer terminals via international communication networksSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 30, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 4, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 26, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 22, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 17, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance