Drawing for TARGETTI

USPTO serial 79033125

TARGETTI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3318813Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 23, 2007
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TARGETTI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bharati Bakshani

Bharati Bakshani LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNEW YORK, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal stands to support apparatus for lightingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009[ Luxmeters, ] electric switches for the operation and control of lighting, [ remote controls for lighting systems ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Apparatus for lighting and relevant accessories, namely, ceiling lamps, [ table lamps, ] wall lamps, desk lamps, [bathroom lamps, ] outdoor lamps, [ floor lamps, ] downlighters, [ laser light projectors, light reflectors, ] built-in electric lighting fixtures, [ outdoor electric lighting fixtures, ] lighting instruments, namely, [ luxmeters, ] electrified lighting tracksSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Non-metal ceiling panels and non-metal wall panels equipped with lighting apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 29, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 23, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 21, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jul 17, 2015RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 19, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 7, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 29, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance