Drawing for NVLD

USPTO serial 79033138

NVLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NVLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical, weighing, measuring, open-loop control, signaling and checking apparatus and instruments, namely, liquid and fuel level indicators and gas, liquid and fuel leakage indicators for automobiles; apparatus, devices and instruments for monitoring and self-regulation of the levels of liquids and fuels and for monitoring leakage of liquids and fuels; devices for detecting, locating and verifying stock changes of liquids and fuels in pipelines to determine if there is a leak; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, converting, storing, controlling and checking electricity; data processing programsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 20, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2010FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 2, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 1, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 1, 2008IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Apr 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2007IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Mar 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance