Drawing for OKKA

USPTO serial 79033188

OKKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OKKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved peas, beans, chickpeas, lentil, soy beans, ground almonds; processed olives, pickles, raisins, prepared walnuts, processed coconuts, olive oil, sunflower oil, sesame oil, tomato paste, preserved fruits and vegetables, namely peaches, apricots, beans, dried fruits, processed and roasted nuts, prepared walnuts, hazel nut spread, ground almonds, processed coconutsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
030Honey, jams, marmalades, Turkish delight (a kind of candy); pastries; pasta; spices, namely, pepper, ginger, cinnamon powderSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
032Fruit and vegetable juices, namely, lemonades, peach juice, apricot juice, sour cherry juice, apple juice, tomato juice; non-alcoholic beverages made of fruit in the form of powder and granulesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 18, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 12, 2014LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 6, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 10, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 27, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 18, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 17, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance