USPTO serial 79033217
TIMBERRITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3476765Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2008
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TIMBERRITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moline, IL, US
Moline, IL, US
Moline, IL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ross Carlson
Ross Carlson Deere & CompanyOne John Deere PlaceGlobal Intellectual Property ServicesMoline, IL 61265Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ forest machines, namely, cut-to-length tree harvesting machines, full tree forest cutting machines, harvester heads, and wheeled feller bunchers, tracked feller bunchers, skidders, knuckle boom log loaders, tracked log loaders ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | electronic controls systems for tree harvesting machine heads; measuring sensors used to measure the tree size, length, diameter and process other relevant data which enable the tree harvesting machine head to cut tree to specific desired length; software that enables the tree harvesters to measure felled trees and cut them to length to meet a number of different harvesting specifications, such as length, diameter, and assist in maintaining inventory of the harvest | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 1, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |