Drawing for PEECON

USPTO serial 79033223

PEECON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3298382Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2007
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with PEECON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

Robert W. Sacoff Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geralds200 South Wacker DriveSuite 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tipping trailers, manure spreaders, feed mixers and push off trailers [ ; wheels and tires for use with agricultural vehicles ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 23, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 26, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 27, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 19, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 19, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 16, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 31, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 13, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 6, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 23, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 14, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 14, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 31, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance