Drawing for SLIDINGCONE

USPTO serial 79033261

SLIDINGCONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, DAYNA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLIDINGCONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motors other than for land vehicles; electric motors for machines; alternation current motors; direct current motors; motors for optical disk drives; rotary motors for compact discs; rotary motors for DVDsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 29, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 31, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 30, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance