Drawing for CHATEAU MALARTIC-LAGRAVIERE

USPTO serial 79033275

CHATEAU MALARTIC-LAGRAVIERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3385721Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 19, 2008
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CHATEAU MALARTIC-LAGRAVIERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce S. Londa

Bruce S. Londa Norris McLaughlin P.A.7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6524UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 18, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 24, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 22, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 4, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 4, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 19, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 16, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2010LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 1, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 24, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 20, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance