USPTO serial 79033279
CARUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3445396Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 10, 2008
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with CARUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter B. Bromaghim
Peter B. Bromaghim Blakely Sokoloff Taylor Zafman LLP12400 Wilshire Boulevard, 7th FloorLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | [ Furniture; ] mirrors; picture frames; furniture of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum, and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics; non-metal bottle closures, caps, [ covers, and turning ] * tubing and rotating * mechanisms for lipsticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household and kitchen utensils and containers, namely, candleholders, eggcups, salt and pepper cellars; combs; brushes used for cosmetic purposes; brush-making materials; steel wool for cleaning; unworked or semi-worked glass, not used in building; perfume vaporizers and parts therefore sold empty; candlesticks, not of precious metal. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | [ Scientific research; scientific research and development in the field of cosmetic products; industrial research services in the field of cosmetic products; legal services; licensing of property rights for others in the field of cosmetic products; design in the field of living accessories. ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seidel GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Seidel GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Seidel GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CARUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 9, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |