Drawing for ESKO

USPTO serial 79033296

ESKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508792Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ESKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

James C. Wray Cermak Nakajima & McGowan LLP2000 Duke Street, Suite 300Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electrical and electronic apparatus for digital typesetting; electrical and electronic film machines for picture typesetting; digital printing machines; laser photo typesetting machines; machines for printing plates; structural parts sold as components of the aforesaid goods and replacement parts thereforACTIVE—
009Electronic apparatus and instruments for preparing and steering printing processes; developing apparatus for printing plates; data processing apparatus and machines for instruments for recording and reproduction of images and films; printers; computer hardware apparatus, namely, digital input and output scanners, peripheral computer apparatus to connect computer to sheets; transmitters of digital data, software and hardware for the graphics industry; structural parts sold as components of the aforesaid goods and replacement parts thereforACTIVE—
035Commercial consultancy related to the sale and marketing of products for the graphic industry for othersACTIVE—
037Installation of computer hardware and consultancy thereto for othersACTIVE—
042Computer programming, development of computer software for others; consultancy related to computer hardware for others; updating of computer software for others; implementation of software and consultancy thereto for others, namely, installation of software for others; consultancy related to the use of hardware and software in the graphics industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 2, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 18, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 5, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 25, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 25, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 9, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 12, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 19, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 10, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 21, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 13, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 4, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance