USPTO serial 79033303
GLAM UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUNCH, TASHIA AUNGELIK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLAM UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials not included in other classes; animal skins, hides; trunks and suitcases; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery; key cases (leather goods), furs (animal skins), wallets, travelling sets (leather goods), visiting card cases, belt bags, shoulder bags, handbags, attaché cases, beach bags, rucksacks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, headgear; shawls, scarves, sashes for wear, belts, gloves | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions, retail and wholesale services, services of import-export agencies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |