CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CHORUS

USPTO serial 79033306

CHORUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3476767Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 29, 2008
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHORUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law299 South Main Street, Suite 1300Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Cloth bannersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
026Accessories for religious furniture, namely, embroidered borders for altar cloths and glass covers, embroideries for the application on fabrics, finger towels, corporals, amices, and veilsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 5, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 6, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 6, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 21, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 16, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 26, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 26, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance