USPTO serial 79033325
TIMEXTENDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3651208Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2009
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIMEXTENDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DK
DK
DK
Tommerup, DK
Tommerup, DK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded computer software, namely, computer software programs for encryption, database management, combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand interface for use within business intelligence, ETL or extract, transform, load, OLAP or data in multi-dimensional cubes, data warehousing, enterprise resource planning or ERP, data quality, master data management, meta data management and data mining, but not including or encompassing any watches, clocks, timepieces, chronometric apparatus or instruments | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education, namely, providing of training in the field of computer software; arranging and conducting educational conferences, congresses, seminars, symposiums and workshops in the field of computer software programs; publication of educational material, namely, manuals, journals, books and magazines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software, namely development and implementing of computer software and IT solution for use within business intelligence, ETL or extract, transform, load, OLAP or data in multi-dimensional cubes, data warehousing, enterprise resource planning or ERP, data quality, master data management, meta data management and data mining; computer programming, maintenance and updating of computer software for use within business intelligence, ETL or extract, transform, load, OLAP or data in multi-dimensional cubes, data warehousing, enterprise resource planning or ERP, data quality, master data management, meta data management and data mining; professional design consultancy regarding computer hardware, installation and repair of the aforementioned computer software, and technical consultancy regarding the aforementioned computer software and hardware | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Timextender Holding ApS
- Other trademarks owned by Timextender Holding ApS
- Other trademarks owned by Timextender A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Neo Vision IT ApS
- Other trademarks owned by Neo Vision IT ApS
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TIMEXTENDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 7, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 28, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2008 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |