USPTO serial 79033373
ONEPROD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3616129Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- LOWRY, LEIGH A
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ONEPROD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Blake R. Hartz
Blake R. Hartz Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204-5137UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for acoustic and vibratory measurements, namely, acoustic meters, vibration meters, noise dosimeters, sound level meters; stand-alone instruments and devices for monitoring and predictive maintenance of machines, namely, micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of industrial machinery; micro-processor based hardware and software linked to a communication network for monitoring and predictive maintenance of industrial machinery; micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of variable-speed or cyclical-operation machines and to predict the maintenance of variable-speed or cyclical-operation machines; data acquisition and processing micro-processor based hardware and software used to monitor the status of variable-speed or cyclical-operation machines and to predict the maintenance of variable-speed or cyclical-operation machines; multi-channel protective monitoring devices, namely, micro processor based hardware and software to trigger the shut down of rotating machines; real time and sequential monitors for monitoring the availability status all for machines and strategic sensors; real time and sequential monitors for monitoring the availability status all for fixed-speed and variable-speed machines and strategic sensors; real time and sequential monitors for monitoring the availability status, all for machines on plain bearings, journal bearings and antifriction bearings and for strategic sensors; computer software for use in storing, analyzing and tending machine data in the field of machine predictive maintenance and vibratory analysis; computer software for use in storing, analyzing and tending machine data in the field of machine predictive maintenance; computer software for use in storing, analyzing and tending machine data related to machine vibrations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |