USPTO serial 79033386
AEROKLAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AEROKLAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Brake locks for vehicle; clutch locks for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Anti-theft warning apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Anti-theft warning apparatus for spare tires (anti-theft device for vehicles, especially for the spare tires); alarm system linked with the vehicle to prevent the tires from being stolen and removed from the vehicle; tonneau covers; car covers for vehicles, trunk tray; front and rear bumps, styling bar; fenders flares; side steps; side visors (for vehicles), super guard; rail guard; side protector; canopy; roof box; roof rail; multi-purpose storage box fixed on the pick-up trunks; tailgate box (tailgate with compartment); compartment tailgate; wheel housing; heat protector fixed under the car's hood | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Window films for vehicles; soundproofing and sound dampening materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Rubber floor mat; echo proofing rubber mats; bed liner for vehicles; cargo liner for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AEROFLEX INSULATION (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by AEROFELX INSULATION; (SHANGHAI) CO. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Aeroklas Australia Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named AEROKLAS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |