USPTO serial 79033429
GIOLIO GIACHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3476770Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2008
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIOLIO GIACHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
I-50024 SAN CASCIANO VAL DI PESA (FI), IT
I-50024 SAN CASCIANO VAL DI PESA (FI), IT
I-50024 SAN CASCIANO VAL DI PESA (FI), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cecelia M. Perry
CECELIA M. PERRY MCGLEW AND TUTTLE, P.C.SCARBOROUGH STATIONSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-9227UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Extra virgin olive oil | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 14, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 14, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |