USPTO serial 79033484
AMSTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3385725Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2008
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMSTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith E. Danish
Keith E. Danish HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PBIR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 14, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |