Drawing for ANSALDO

USPTO serial 79033510

ANSALDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3472411Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 22, 2008
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ANSALDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Larry H. Tronco

Larry H. Tronco Holland & Hart, LLPPO Box 8749Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely, books and manuals in the field of transportation, particularly the signaling and control systems used in the transportation industryACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services for use in the transportation sector, namely, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network and to a global satellite in the fields of wireless application protocol for controlling, switching and position location for railways and railway cars, general packet radio services in the nature of radio, telephone, telegraph communication services and universal mobile telecommunication systems, namely, providing signal transmission via universal mobile telecommunication systems for the purpose of communication between railway cars, including communication regarding position location and info mobility rental; telecommunication services for use in the transportation sector, namely, providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users in the nautical, maritime, transportation, signaling, and railways fields; signaling telecommunications in the railways and underground sectors, namely, transmission of sound, picture and data signals and transmission, reception and processing of coded and emergency signalsACTIVE—
042Design of information technology networks and design of electronic signaling mechanism, namely, a train control system used in the railway industry for detecting and controlling trains, ground faults, broken rails, power failures, track switches and lights, in the transportation sector; Engineering of turnkey railways and underground railway stations; Design for others and engineering of tram railway lines; Consulting related to computer software and hardware used in transportation systems, in particular railway systems; Consultancy regarding software and information technology related to railway car signalingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 13, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 11, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 23, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 22, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2017CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Feb 23, 2017REINREINSTATED—
Jan 26, 2017CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 7, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 9, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 25, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 2, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2009CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Oct 9, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 30, 2009OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 5, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 28, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2007IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2007IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance