CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LIME TRAP

USPTO serial 79033516

LIME TRAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453946Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIME TRAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald S. Kareken

Ronald S. Kareken Hiscock & Barclay, LLP2000 HSBC Plaza, 100 Chestnut StreetRochester, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water conducting apparatus, namely, interceptors for use in separating solids and liquids; Waste water treatment systems, namely, water filters; Water cleaning treatment systems, namely, flotation plants, sedimentation plants, biological purification plants, mechanical purification plants and precipitation units; Water-purifying apparatus, namely, water treatment systems in the nature of flotation plants, sedimentation plants, biological purification plants, mechanical purification plants and precipitation units; Water-purifying machines, namely, water treatment machines in the nature of flotation plants, sedimentation plants, biological purification plants, mechanical purification plants and precipitation unitsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Technical planning services for waste water and industrial fluid treating and cleaning systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 7, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 7, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance