USPTO serial 79033534
SC SUPER BENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3508793Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2008
- Examiner
- STRUCK, ROBERT J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SC SUPER BENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Schmidt + Clemens GmbH + Co. KG
51789 Lindlar, DE
Schmidt + Clemens GmbH + Co. KG
51789 Lindlar, DE
Schmidt + Clemens GmbH + Co. KG
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Pipes and tubes of metal, in particular centrifugally cast pipes with interior profiles for gas-cracking installations and steam cracking installations in the field of chemical plants, especially petro-chemical plants and fertilizer plants, and in the field of industrial furnaces, in particular for use in the radiant zones in steam cracker and steam reformer furnaces; crude and semi-wrought common metals and their alloys, in particular stainless steel; stainless steel castings and centrifugally cast, stainless steel pipes for use in chemical plants, especially petro-chemical plants and fertilizer plants, and in the field of industrial furnaces, in particular for use in the radiant zones in steam cracker and steam reformer furnaces; metal castings being shaped in the form of metal parts for industrial furnaces and furnace installations, for pumps in power stations and chemical works, for fittings in the chemical and plastics industries and for industrial furnace construction, shipbuilding and mechanical engineering; metal castings being shaped in the form of metal parts made from heat-resistant and wear-resistant special alloys for descaling installations in cement factories and ore-roasting installations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | Treatment of materials, namely, treatment of metal | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Engineering, in particular the design, calculation, in particular advance calculation, of industrial installations, in particular installations in the chemical and plastics industries, engineering drawings for industrial installations, in particular installations in the chemical and plastics industries; surveying; construction drafting, in particular for industrial installations, in particular installations in the chemical and plastics industries; technical project studies, namely, technical surveying; conducting measurements, namely, measurement evaluations for industrial installations, in particular installations in the chemical and plastics industries, in particular to define operational parameters for industrial installations; calculation of the operational ratings of industrial installations, in particular installations in the chemical and plastics industries, in particular calculation of efficiency ratings, namely, testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others for the purpose of centrifugation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Schmidt + Clemens GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Schmidt + Clemens GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Schmidt + Clemens GmbH + Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SC SUPER BENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |