USPTO serial 79033536
COOLPAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3527661Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 4, 2008
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOLPAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
YULONG COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATION; SCIENTIFIC (SHENZHEN) Co., LTD
CN
Other trademarks owned by YULONG COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATION; SCIENTIFIC (SHENZHEN) Co., LTD
YULONG COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATION; SCIENTIFIC (SHENZHEN) Co., LTD
CN
Other trademarks owned by YULONG COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATION; SCIENTIFIC (SHENZHEN) Co., LTD
Yulong Computer Telecommunication Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
CN
Other trademarks owned by Yulong Computer Telecommunication Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Brett Heavner
B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LL901 NEW YORK AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ photography cameras; computer software use in database management; electronic pocket translators; ] radiotelephony set comprise of transmitters and receivers; video telephones [ ; acoustics sets, namely, apparatus for wireless transmission of acoustic information ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by YULONG COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATION; SCIENTIFIC (SHENZHEN) Co., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by YULONG COMPUTER TELECOMMUNICATION; SCIENTIFIC (SHENZHEN) Co., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by Yulong Computer Telecommunication Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named COOLPAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 29, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 7, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 7, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |