USPTO serial 79033568
CORE-POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORE-POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer games and video games, including on-line and downloadable games for computers via the Internet; automatic games, apparatus for games adapted for use with television receivers; software applications for development of computer games and video games, including on-line and downloadable games for computers via the Internet; cinematographic films; animated cartoons; film strips; cinematographic film (exposed); magnetic recordings; optical recordings; magneto-optical recordings; solid-state recordings; audio-visual teaching apparatus; amusement apparatus adapted for use with television receivers and computer games; computer game peripherals; electronic books and publications; electronic games adapted with television receivers or video monitor; interactive games adapted for use with television receivers; electrical and video amusement apparatus and instruments adapted with television receivers or video monitor; multi-media discs and publications; multi-media recordings and publications; laser-readable discs; video discs and publications; computer software; computer programs; digital recordings; media bearing, or for recording, sound and/or video and/or data and/or information; apparatus and instruments for recording and/or reproducing sound and/or video and/or information; holograms; sound recordings; pre-recorded disks; recording disks; compact discs; video tapes; laser discs; compact discs-interactive CD ROMs; digital video discs (DVD); communications apparatus and instruments; mobile phone games; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; digital games; instructional and teaching materials in the form of apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Production and distribution of entertainment and educational services and production of television programmes, production of entertainment programmes via Internet, videotape film production, film production, production of interactive and non-interactive entertainment media for portable media devices including mobile phones; publishing services including online content and computer game related content; provision of online channels for computer game related activities; organising and conducting sporting events, computer game related events, game shows, performances, live events and competitions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2009 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 10, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |