USPTO serial 79033578
HAARUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HAARUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machinery and machine tools, plants and process equipment for manufacturing and mixing of concrete, vibration equipment and machinery including motor vibrators and mechanical vibrators for industrial use and control devices therefor, machines for batching and dosing, feeders (parts of machines), concrete conveyors (machines), motors (not for land vehicles), couplings and driving belts (not for land vehicles) and parts (not included in other classes) for all the mentioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building construction, repair, installation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design in connection with these services, industrial analysis and research, design and development of computer hardware and computer software, legal advice | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |