USPTO serial 79033652
EXTRUSION SECURITY MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXTRUSION SECURITY MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs; other electronic machines, apparatus and their parts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Data processing by using computers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Maintenance of telecommunication networks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Rental/leasing of access time to computer databases | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer software design, computer programming or maintenance of computer software; search, analysis and consultancy relating to computer software design, computer programming or maintenance of computer software; providing information relating to computer software design, computer programming or maintenance of computer software; configuration, expansion and addition of computer programs; design and planning of telecommunication networks; search, analysis and consultancy relating to telecommunication network systems; creating and maintaining web sites; authentication of users in electronic transactions; rental of computers; providing computer software; creating homepages in the Internet; rental of computer servers for the Internet; supervision of computer systems; failure diagnosis and virus checking of computer programs; updating of computer programs; remote supervision of computer programs; remote supervision of computer systems; audit of computer systems; remote supervision, search and analysis of failure of telecommunication networks; consultancy relating to remote supervision, search and analysis of failure of telecommunication networks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Intelligent Wave; (Intelligent Wave Inc.)
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EXTRUSION SECURITY MANAGEMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |