Drawing for HELBING HAMBURGS FEINER KÜMMEL

USPTO serial 79033675

HELBING HAMBURGS FEINER KÜMMEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3587215Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 10, 2009
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HELBING HAMBURGS FEINER KÜMMEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Seth I. Appel

Seth I. Appel Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP125 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2050Chicago, IL 60606-4450United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages (except beers)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 17, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2025ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Jun 17, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 4, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 30, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 11, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Apr 11, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 11, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 10, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Mar 10, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2009FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 19, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 10, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 10, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 23, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 21, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 14, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 13, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 12, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance