USPTO serial 79033677
KRANTZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3543727Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2008
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KRANTZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
DE
M+W Zander Gebäudetechnik GmbH
DE
M+W Zander Gebäudetechnik GmbH
DE
München, DE
52072 Aachen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEWART J. BELLUS
STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | FILTER SEPARATORS, NAMELY, OIL SEPARATORS, DUST SEPARATORS, CYCLONE SEPARATORS, CENTRIFUGAL SEPARATORS; ADSORPTION SEPARATORS, NAMELY, OIL SEPARATORS, DUST SEPARATORS, CYCLONE SEPARATORS, CENTRIFUGAL SEPARATORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | INSTALLATIONS FOR TECHNICAL BUILDING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TECHNICAL INSTALLATIONS FOR CENTRAL AIR CONDITIONING, NAMELY, VENTILATORS FOR AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS AND HEATING FURNACES; CHILLER CEILING SYSTEMS COMPRISING COLD WATER HEAT EXCHANGERS, CEILING TILES AND PANELS; AIR VENTS, NAMELY, VENTILATING EXHAUST FANS; VENTILATION APPARATUS, NAMELY, AIR INLETS, INLET GUIDE VANES, FOR AIR STREAMS, STREAMLINE FLOW INLETS AND DISPLACEMENT INLETS BEING PARTS OF AIR HEATING AND AIR COOLING UNITS; VOLUME FLOW RATE REGULATING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, BUTTERFLY VALVES BEING PARTS OF AIR HEATING AND AIR COOLING UNITS; COOLING AND HEATING APPLIANCES FOR INSTALLATION ON CEILINGS AND FACADES FOR COOLING AND HEATING ROOMS; PROCESS AIR CONDITIONING INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, TECHNICAL INSTALLATIONS FOR AIR CONDITIONING AND VENTILATION FOR SAFE GUARDING PRODUCTION PROCESSES AND CONDITIONING OF GOODS; CLEAN ROOM INSTALLATIONS; WALL, CEILING AND FLOOR SYSTEMS FOR CLEAN ROOMS CONSISTING OF AIR FILTERS AND AIR INLETS AND OUTLETS FOR CLEAN ROOMS; SLUICES AND PIPES OF METAL AND PLASTIC FOR THE SUPPLY AND DISPOSAL OF MEDIA AS PARTS OF SANITARY INSTALLATIONS; AIR CONDITIONING APPARATUS FOR USE IN CLEAN ROOMS; INSTALLATIONS FOR DISINFECTING WATER, NAMELY, WATER FILTERS FOR TREATMENT OF WATER BY MEANS OF RADIATION AS PART OF AIR HUMIDIFIERS IN AIR CONDITIONERS; MEDIA TREATMENT INSTALLATIONS FOR TREATING AND PURIFYING WATER ESSENTIALLY CONSISTING OF EXHAUST AIR AND FLUE GAS PURIFIERS FOR THERMIC REGENERATION. THERMIC RECUPERATION, CATALYTIC POST COMBUSTION FOR THE SEPARATION OF DUST, AEROSOLS AND GASEOUS IMPURITIES; THERMIC AND CATALYTIC OXIDIZERS FOR THERE CONCENTRATION OF CONTAMINANTS AND THE RECUPERATION OF HEAT; THERMIC FLUE GAS PURIFIERS, HEAT REGENERATORS USED IN CONNECTION WITH FLUE GAS AND EMISSION SCRUBBERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caverion GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Caverion GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by M+W Zander Gebäudetechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by M+W Zander Gebäudetechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Caverion Deutschland GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Krantz GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named KRANTZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |