Drawing for NOVOFLOW

USPTO serial 79033724

NOVOFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453950Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NOVOFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Krista Weber Powell

Krista Weber Powell TraskBritt, P.C.230 South 500 East, Suite 300Salt Lake City, UT 84102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Vacuum pumps for cleaning purposes; vacuum cleaners; central vacuum cleaners; ] filtering machines for the filtration of fluids, namely, oils, fuels, food and chemical processing fluids excluding water; fluid filtering machines for industries, namely, chemical industries, pharmaceutical industries, biotechnological enterprises, food industries, beverage industries, wood processing, plastics processing, agriculture industries, processing of metal, textile industries, electronic industries, sugar industries all for the filtration of fluids excluding water; filters as parts of [ clothes washing machines, dish washing machines, ] machines used for process filtration in the pharmaceutical industry, milking machines, polishing machines for use in grinding and polishing metal, wood, ceramics and plastics, pulping machines, semiconductor manufacturing machines, vehicle washing machines, washing machines for industrial parts, and motors, namely, for the filtration of fluids excluding water; structural parts of filtering machines, namely, filter units and spacers used to separate filtering unitsACTIVE—
011[ Air filter for domestic and industrial installation use; air filtering devices, namely, air filters for cleaning of air at industrial and commercial working places; drinking water filter; ] water filtration apparatus, namely, water filters and water filtering machines for use in industry; [ swimming pool water cleaning and filtering units; ] water cleaning apparatus and machines; water filters for sewage purification plantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 15, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 6, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 23, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 23, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 23, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 22, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 24, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 6, 2015INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 27, 2015INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 27, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 26, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 9, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 9, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 20, 2008FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
May 16, 2008ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 1, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 26, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2007REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance